td-98ce74

referral-onboarding-widgets-causality-question

in_review task P2 Parent: td-00e401
Created Mar 13, 2026 9:10 AM Updated Apr 12, 2026 12:27 AM
Description
Before adding more widgets/join block to guided setup, must answer: do paid merchants turn on widgets because they decided to pay, or did turning on widgets drive the payment decision? Raised by Glenn 2026-03-12.
Handoff
Done
Session Log (5 entries)
Mar 13, 9:10 AM
lg-4be41de2 ses_f8c396
progress
Started work
Mar 13, 9:10 AM
lg-0bc3bbd1 ses_f8c396
decision
From Make Onboarding Great 2026-03-12: Do NOT add widgets/join block to guided setup until we answer the causality question. Glenn's framing: 'Are we seeing merchants that are paid having the widgets turned on because they've decided to go forward with the program? Or is it the fact that they've turned the widgets on the reason why they've decided to pay?' If it's the former (decided to pay → widgets), adding widgets to guided setup is a red herring. If the latter (widgets → decided to pay), nudging earlier could help. Original goal was to simplify setup — adding complexity may reintroduce anxiety we worked to reduce. See [[2026-03-12-make-onboarding-great]], [[make-onboarding-great]]
Monday, March 16, 2026
Mar 16, 7:17 PM
lg-436a3709 ses_26ddfd
decision
Data shows activation alone doesn't drive payment (37.3% vs 30.3% for never-activated). The real driver is getting referrals (87.3% paid rate). Adding activation to guided setup is wrong optimization — would move merchants from 'never' to 'activated-no-referrals' which barely helps conversion and worsens retention. Right question: how to get merchants from activation to first referral faster. See [[2026-03-16-activation-payment-analysis]], [[td-914d33]]
Sunday, April 12, 2026
Apr 12, 12:27 AM
lg-c6c8b314 ses_b44c4e
progress
Started work
Apr 12, 12:27 AM
lg-4271a6cc ses_b44c4e
progress
Submitted for review
Git State
Started 7f6d2ac (master) Current 63a3658 (master)
Sessions Involved